Does the end justify the means essay

Does the end justify the means essay

Does The Ends Ever Justify The Means?,You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

WebWhen considering the notion that “the end justifies the means,” this does not only have to imply that “the means” must inherently be immoral; quite the opposite can be true. An WebIn general, the phrase “The end justifies the means” means an act of doing bad or wicked things in order to achieve a goal. Technically speaking, this is when someone wants to WebThe end justifies the means The end justifies the means is an expression that is often used in society to validate or excuse distasteful and objectionable actions undertaken by its WebDoes the End Justify the Means. Lesley Rawlins The end justifies the means The end justifies the means is an expression that is often used in society to validate or excuse WebNov 18,  · End Justify Means At the beginning of an action we might not know whether the action is morally correct or wrong but when morally right goal is successfully ... read more

However, the means were not McGraw, To make comparisons regarding what is considered to be wrong and morally right, here is an example to give clarity about the two. For instance, a person can lie about his credentials on his resume in trying to get a better job. The person can justify his actions by saying that, the lying was meant to help him receive a huge salary to help him provide for his family more effectively. Another example is justifying an abortion to save the life of the mother. Both the two cases create a dilemma in trying to establish the authenticity of what is done and what ought to have been done Bartlett, Either way, there are consequences in following this political axiom.

According to these examples, taking the life of an innocent infant and lying are both viewed as equally wrong. What if the person who lied about his resume was not given the job because he was not truthful? What if the baby aborted was to become a very successful and influential individual? Thus the wrong means used can lead to ruin rather than good Robertson, People should be indeed concerned about the end itself, is it perfect? Additionally, there is need to explore the means adopted in achieving a particular outcome, and how they affect the ends McGraw, Difficulties and complications are witnessed especially when unworthy means are used to achieve a particular end, as it was in the case of the 1st and 2nd World Wars.

Were the ends of such ruthless means necessary? Thus, the consequences of following these political axioms are regularly seen in wartimes situations and political environments. Governments employ whatever methods as long they come out victorious irrespective of losing lives and property Bartlett, Means used are supposed to be ethical and morally upright. Therefore, if one adopts a particular mean that is potentially bad in itself, it cannot serve a positive end even though it may appear right on the surface. An outcome achieved through an upright approach is what is justified and not the wrong mean.

Remember: This is just a sample from a fellow student. Starting from 3 hours delivery. This paper includes a comparison between Joseph Stalin and the non- idealistic, successful prince created by Niccolo Machiavelli. Niccolo Machiavelli portrayed how this realistic leader should be in his book, The Prince. The conflict between the ideal and the reality has long been the center of the debate in the history of political philosophy. Many famous philosophers have constructed an imaginary world upon which their entire theories are [ To take over a nation or organization, the cleverest method to take would be by following the wise advices of Sun Tzu in his remarkable work the Art of War and Machiavelli in his notable work The Prince.

By following these wise [ He argues on topics such as whether it's better to be loved or feared, whether to be generous or stingy, and how virture can be [ At first thought, this question seems simple enough. After all, Nicolo Machiavelli did more or less write an "autocrat's handbook" when he authored The Prince. In this text, Machiavelli explains how an autocrat rises to power, [ Aristotle was a greek philosopher who lived approximately years ago. He is considered one of the great philosophers from his time, and he is still widely known and highly regarded today. During his lifetime, he came up with [ This essay will attempt to discuss both, including [ The Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx and Fredrich Engels, has become one of the world's most influential and significant pieces of political propaganda ever written.

It contains the viewpoints and ideology of the [ We will occasionally send you account related emails. This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before. Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper. We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together! We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. This essay has been submitted by a student. These results clearly demonstrate that it is the environment that contributes to the behaviors observed.

Those who were given the role of guard expressed the power and control they had over the prisoners. The prisoners began to become hopeless and bend to the power of the guards. The article on the Stanford Prison Experiment titled, A Study of Prisoners and Guards in a Simulated Prison and written by the Office of Naval Research, provides us with the overall information that deals with this controversial psychological study. The study was conducted by. In , in an attempt to understand the conformity to roles of guards and prisoners, Zimbardo launched a role-playing experiment that modeled prison life and reflected the environment of an American prison. In other words, there is a dispositional hypothesis that states that prison guards act the way they do because their personalities cause.

The air is saturated with the smell of concrete and fear. The wailing of men echoes through the dark, unholy halls. A new face makes its way in. Only thing harder than holding back tears, are trying to not show fear. They will feed of it, off of me. It will not break me; I will not break. This is what to expect from an evil place where grown men can be molded; broken and reformed into a weaker being or into a strong piece of iron. The Stanford Prison Experiment was a study put together by Phillip Zambardo to test the psychological effects of a prisoner and guard scenario in a mock prison setting. The experiment lasted seven to fourteen days and was comprised of twenty-four male students, who were picked at random to take part in the experiment.

The role of guard and prisoner were also selected at random. The mock prisoners were subjugated to psychological abuse, harsh authoritarian rule by the guards, and intense living conditions to ensure maximum results were met. The experiment concluded early and a couple prisoners left due to an intense amount of stress brought on from the ordeal. Although the experiment was brief, it gave a great deal of insight into how environment can abruptly affect the psychological well-being of an individual. Every person picked for this experiment was not. In Philip Zimbardo and his collages Craig Haney, Curtis Banks, David Jaffe, and ex-convict consultant, Carlo Prescott formulated a social experiment that addressed the underlying and basic physical mechanisms of human aggression Henry, Banks, and Zimbardo, The experiment was planned to last two weeks and consist of male college students.

The study was based upon the dynamic of the authority of prison guards and submissive behavior of the prisons inmates. Therefore, the experiment required for a mock prison to be built. The aim of this experiment was to investigate how readily people would conform to the roles of a guard and a prisoner. In this role playing simulation, individual would experience prison life. Zimbardo was interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was dispositional: due to the sadistic personalities of the guards, or Situational: having more to do with the prison environment. For example, prisoner and guards may have personalities which make conflict inevitable, with prisoners lacking respect for law, order, and any authoritative figure and guards having domineering and aggressive personalities.

Alternatively, prisoners and guards may behave in a hostile manner due to the rigid power structure of the social environment in prisons. If the prisoners and guards were not aggressive towards one another this would support the dispositional hypothesis, or if their behavior was similar to those in real prisons this would support the situational explanation. She addresses and refutes the accepted belief that the Stanford Prison Experiment proved that anyone could become a tyrant when given or instructed by a source of authority. She argues that it should not have been so shocking. However, with her diction and choice of evidence she displaces the study's culpability in a way that ultimately blurs and undermines her claim. This paper serves to summarize The Zimbardo Prison Experiment, better known as The Stanford Prison Experiment which was conducted by Phillip Zimbardo in at Stanford University.

The purpose of the study was to conduct research in order to better understand the psychological components of human aggression and submission to include conformity and obedience in a prison environment with a select group of subjects playing roles as either prison guards or inmates, however, I should note, according to McLeod, S. Experiments with similar objectives were carried out by Stanley Milgram and others. Jones, A. In Philip Zimbardo conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment SPE in the basement of Stanford University as a mock prison. Zimbardo wanted to encourage deindividuation by giving participants different uniforms and different living conditions the guards had luxuries and the prisoners were living as real prisoners.

The guards quickly began acting authoritarian, being aggressive towards the prisoners and giving them punishments causing physical and emotional breakdowns. Essay Topics Writing. Home Page Research Does the End Justify the Means. Does the End Justify the Means Good Essays. Open Document. Lesley Rawlins The end justifies the means The end justifies the means is an expression that is often used in society to validate or excuse distasteful and objectionable actions undertaken by its people. In effect, the phrase is a justification for dispensing with all morality and principle in the passage towards a successful conclusion. In simpler terms, anything is reasonable if it leads to a significant and meaningful outcome. Zimbardo wanted to investigate whether the cruelty reported among guards in American prisons was due to the aggressive personalities of the guards or the prison environment itself.

Twenty-four well adjusted undergraduates were selected out of over 75 to play the roles of both guards and prisoners. The guards were permitted to devise most of the rules. After the initial rebellion most of the prisoners stopped opposing the guards losing their personal identity and self-belief. Get Access. Decent Essays. Zimbardo Prison Study Essay Words 2 Pages. Zimbardo Prison Study Essay. Read More. Better Essays. The Stanford Prison Experiment And The Abu Ghraib Scandal Words 8 Pages. The Stanford Prison Experiment And The Abu Ghraib Scandal.

This question can be answered on both sides as yes it does justify and no it does not justify the means. It all depends on the situation in hand. Were the steps to achieve the end good or bad? If the steps to the end were good then it justifies but if it was bad then it does not justify. So the answer to the question would be depending on the means to get there and the end results. There had been many incidents. Do the ends justify the means? Is it morally reasonable to commit immoral actions if the outcome is right and just, or if the outcome benefits more than what the actions did wrong? Some argue that if the outcome is morally right then the actions are morally justified, while others argue that the morality of the end result does not justify the actions taken to achieve it; who knows which side is right.

The end justifies the means The end justifies the means is an expression that is often used in society to validate or excuse distasteful and objectionable actions undertaken by its people. In effect, the phrase is a justification for dispensing with all morality and principle in the passage towards a successful conclusion. Does the End Justify the Means in War? The reasons for war vary from protecting and preserving our freedom, to economic reasons. Should the adage be followed unconditionally in terms of all wars? In the case of the U. Next we will discuss if this acceptance of this doctrine should be unconditional.

Then we will look if this doctrine can be used on a situational basis such as with war vs. Finally we will discuss what possible consequences might arise from following or not following, this political axiom. Should We Accept the Political. However, it is more used when talking about morality issues whereby it means that the morality of an action or behavior depends entirely on the result of that action and not the behavior or action itself. This is phrase that can be viewed different by proponent of different moral theories. A consequentialist theorist will agree. It will explore. Do the end justifies the means? In this essay I will be answering the question 'do the ends justify the means in the case of terrorism?

For example, if a man stole bread from a shop in order to feed his family did he do the right thing? However, today we are going to talk about a very important topic that has been debated for decades: Terrorism. Also because the benefit come at the cost of a great amount of death. The Prince, it is implied that the ends justify the means. With that statement comes utilitarian qualities and implications such as ten people can be unwillingly sacrificed to save the lives of one hundred or that it is morally sound to torture a terrorist to save multiple lives. The utilitarian qualities of The Prince advocate immoral and unethical processes to achieve honorable or even commendable means and is immoral in it of itself.

In using ends justify means, the morality of the actions are not. Hi everyone, How does this relate to the cost-benefit analysis approach to morality? In my opinion, the surgeon was doing the right thing by removing the men from battle. In his mind, he was thinking, if he got those men out of the battle field then he would be helping them. The thought process of the surgeon was definitely connected the cost-benefit analysis approach to morality. His thinking was to save the most soldiers he could to reduce the most death and injury. I believe he. terrorist justifies the use of torture to stop such a barbaric act. When a terrorist has clearly intended to harm the lives of millions, why is it not justified then, to inflict pain on the terrorist, with the motive of wanting to protect the lives of many more innocent people?

Well because every single person is born with human dignity and rights, and no matter what somebody thinks they do not have the right to torture anyone regardless of what that person has done or will do. It does not matter. This idea has raised questions and scenarios that continually push the bound of morality. Should you be a government whistleblower? Is it acceptable to sacrifice your grandchild or any child to save the world? We never have the same answer to these questions. formulates his moral code in several ways. First, he says to act as if the maxim of your action were to become a universal law of nature, and also to act in such a way that one never uses his or herself or any other person simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end.

Kant flagrantly demands that people must not exploit one. rights, and the laws are commonly guarded and sacred. The theory states that the end does not automatically justify the means, especially if they require breaking an important rule, right, or law. The utilitarian theory states that if given a number of alternatives, you should choose the one that will be of most benefit to the greatest number. The theory revolves around the concept of the end justifies the means. The theory was introduced by philosophers John Mill and Jeremy Bentham. The theorist. Categorical decisions analyzing the morality of the actions being taken to reach a desired result.

If the actions are immoral, a different decision may be made, which would also result in a different outcome. This is a decent method when making decisions because the person who made the decision will feel right in his or her mind. A categorical person would want to know that the actions made depending on severity of the situation justify the severity. Essay Topics Writing. Home Page Research Does the End Justify the Means? Does the End Justify the Means? Satisfactory Essays. Open Document. Write a response to the question, "Does the end justify the means?

Post your response as a reply to this topic. Read other's responses and feel free to comment on other's threads and have an open discussion. The ends justifying the means is extremely difficult to generalize. The answer is much more complex than a simple yes or no. Quite often, if not most of the time, the end does not justify the means. But sometimes it can happen. If a person was raised with religious values and taught it is wrong to steal, would they steal if they had a family that was dying from starvation? Here in lies the dilemma. What if the person is caught and goes to jail? Now the family starves and the person cannot help in any means. This would be considered a bad consequence and therein, a bad act. For instance; a police officer who gives a drug dealer or thief a free pass if they provide information on a higher value criminal.

Is the law subjective for this person who is. Get Access. Decent Essays. Does The End Justify The Means? Read More. Good Essays. Does The End Justify The Means Words 5 Pages. Does The End Justify The Means. Does the End Justify the Means Words 6 Pages. Does the End Justify the Means. Does The End Justify The Means In War? Analysis: Does The End Justify The Means Words 4 Pages. Analysis: Does The End Justify The Means. Morality And The Moral Theories Words 5 Pages. Morality And The Moral Theories. Assessment of a Statement Essay Words 5 Pages. Assessment of a Statement Essay.

Do The End Justify The Means? Means In The Prince By Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince Words 4 Pages. Means In The Prince By Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince. Cost-Benefit Analysis Approach To Morality Words 2 Pages. Cost-Benefit Analysis Approach To Morality.

Does The End Justifies the Means,Related Essays

WebThe end justifies the means The end justifies the means is an expression that is often used in society to validate or excuse distasteful and objectionable actions undertaken by its WebDoes the End Justify the Means. Lesley Rawlins The end justifies the means The end justifies the means is an expression that is often used in society to validate or excuse WebSep 24,  · Does the end ever justify the means? The response to this inquiry relies upon what the outcomes or objectives are and what implies are being utilized to WebNov 18,  · End Justify Means At the beginning of an action we might not know whether the action is morally correct or wrong but when morally right goal is successfully WebWhen considering the notion that “the end justifies the means,” this does not only have to imply that “the means” must inherently be immoral; quite the opposite can be true. An WebIn general, the phrase “The end justifies the means” means an act of doing bad or wicked things in order to achieve a goal. Technically speaking, this is when someone wants to ... read more

Does the end ever justify the means? The scientists infused the patients with syphilis and gonorrhea —and insisted a significant number of patients to pass the illness on to others by having sexual relationships. Zimbardo wanted to see how people reacted when they are either put in captivity or in charge of others. A consequentialist theorist will agree. In this essay I will be answering the question 'do the ends justify the means in the case of terrorism? The outcome is more important than the steps taken to achieve it. Decent Essays.

Type of your assignment. Both the two cases create a dilemma in trying to establish the authenticity of what is done and what ought to have been done Bartlett, However, with the moral rules and morals sheets set up the members are as a general rule appropriately ensured. The end does not justify the means. Does the End Justify the Means? Live chat Order now. Does the end ever justify the means?